49% International Cricketers Prefer Highly Paid T20 Leagues over Central Contracts : FICA Report


The relevance of international leagues has seen a proliferation over a past few years and off late this has questioned the sustainability of one-day cricket. This was further stated in FICA’s recent annual report that suggested international cricketers except India, rejecting their respective country’s central contracts to become freelance agents for the T20 leagues across the globe.

It is to be noted that the Indian players’ body is not under the aegis of FICA whose sample survey doesn’t include the Indian cricketers.

According to FICA annual report, “49% would consider rejecting a central contract if they were paid more to play in domestic leagues”.

FIFA World Cup 2022 Points Table | FIFA World Cup 2022 Schedule | FIFA World Cup 2022 Results | FIFA World Cup 2022 Golden Boot

This has come up at a time when the debate over relevance of ODI cricket has caught fire. The report therefore suggests that there is a marked dip in the percentage of cricketers who still think that ODI World Cup is the most important event in the ICC calendar.

“54% still consider the 50 over World Cup as the pinnacle ICC event, although this has reduced significantly from 86% in the 2018/19 FICA survey,” the report stated.

The FICA, in its report, has segregated the current employment scenario of cricketers into three distinct categories — Traditional market, Hybrid market, Free Agency Market.

The division of percentage is 18% in traditional market which is about players having primary home domestic/international contracts. The Hybrid Market, which involves primary home domestic/international contract as well as overseas domestic contract (T20 leagues, county), has 42% cricketers while the most alarming rate of increase is the Free Agency market which constitutes 40 per cent.

Free Agency market solely involves multiple home and overseas domestic contract (own country’s T20 league as well as other T20 leagues across globe).

Interestingly, the inference drawn from the trend is that traditional market only constitutes Indian players as they are not allowed to play overseas T20 leagues.

“The growing trend is for players to move towards hybrid or free agent status, with 82% of the top 100 players from the T20 Player Index now in this category. 40% of the top T20 players in the world now do not have a central contract with a top nine cricket country,” the report said.

ALSO READ | BCCI Ethics Officer Vineet Saran Serves Conflict of Interest Notice to President Roger Binny

“Most of the best players in the world are now in the hybrid / free agency markets. The percentages plotted above only reflect central/nationally contracted players featuring within the top 100 of the T20 Player Index. Almost all of the 18% ‘traditional market’ players are from India, highlighting the restraints placed on these players preventing participation in overseas domestic leagues,” it further stated.

Vast difference in international cricket exposure. The report stated that countries ranked between 1-9 in ICC list played 81.5 days of international cricket in 2021 while countries ranked between 10-20 played an average of 21.5 days.

There were 485 international fixtures in 2021 alone, 195 more than the 290 that happened in 2020 due to COVID-19 but still significantly lesser than 522 games that took place around the globe in 2019.

Mohammed Rizwan with 80 calendar days in 2021 had the highest international cricket workload while Rishabh Pant with 75 days is highest amongst Indians. In between, there is Joe Root with 78 days of cricket in 2021.

(With PTI Inputs)

Get the latest Cricket News, Schedule and Cricket Live Scores here

Source link

Previous articleTunisia vs France FIFA World Cup 2022 LIVE Streaming: How to watch TUN vs FRA and football World Cup matches for free online and TV in India?
Next articleHo Chi Minh City’s plastic ‘habit’ leaves piles of waste
SATARK NEWS ENGLISH was launched in 2020. And in just a few months, it became the famous English news website in India and abroad. And now we publish with three different languages English, Hindi, and Urdu.